"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On Wednesday 26 April 2006 01:22, Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>> Is there a reason not to use the runtime debugging infrastructure we
>> have? Most of that is "intensive" as well...
>
> What do you mean by "the runtime debugging infrastructure"? If you mean 
> grub_dprintf, it is not enough, since you cannot embed file names and line 
> numbers where the functions are called.

IIRC this is being done automatically.  Or do I misunderstand
something?

--
Marco



_______________________________________________
Grub-devel mailing list
Grub-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel

Reply via email to