"Yoshinori K. Okuji" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Wednesday 26 April 2006 01:22, Hollis Blanchard wrote: >> Is there a reason not to use the runtime debugging infrastructure we >> have? Most of that is "intensive" as well... > > What do you mean by "the runtime debugging infrastructure"? If you mean > grub_dprintf, it is not enough, since you cannot embed file names and line > numbers where the functions are called.
IIRC this is being done automatically. Or do I misunderstand something? -- Marco _______________________________________________ Grub-devel mailing list Grub-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/grub-devel