surely RFC9323 is relevant here - yes? Geoff
> On 17 Oct 2024, at 2:50 AM, Joe Abley <jab...@strandkip.nl> wrote: > > Hi all, > > Per below, Algin and I have written up a proposal that feels grow-ish. > > Hopefully the idea and why we think it's useful is obvious from the text, but > let us know if not and we will explain ourselves. The draft describes > something we are interested in doing at Cloudflare, but we think it's broader > than just one operator and it feels like some shared consensus about this > kind of thing would be useful. > > I have asked Job for a few minutes on the wg agenda in Dublin to discuss, if > there's time. > > > Joe > > Begin forwarded message: > >> From: internet-dra...@ietf.org >> Subject: New Version Notification for >> draft-martin-grow-rpki-generated-loa-00.txt >> Date: October 16, 2024 at 16:14:50 CEST >> To: "Algin Martin" <al...@cloudflare.com>, "Joe Abley" >> <jab...@cloudflare.com> >> >> A new version of Internet-Draft draft-martin-grow-rpki-generated-loa-00.txt >> has been successfully submitted by Joe Abley and posted to the >> IETF repository. >> >> Name: draft-martin-grow-rpki-generated-loa >> Revision: 00 >> Title: Generating a Letter of Agency to reflect RPKI Validity >> Date: 2024-10-16 >> Group: Individual Submission >> Pages: 11 >> URL: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-martin-grow-rpki-generated-loa-00.txt >> Status: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-martin-grow-rpki-generated-loa/ >> HTML: >> https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-martin-grow-rpki-generated-loa-00.html >> HTMLized: >> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-martin-grow-rpki-generated-loa >> >> >> Abstract: >> >> Letters of Agency (LOA) are commonly used to authorise network >> providers to accept and propagate routing information received from >> others. The Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) can be used to >> perform a similar function, with the advantage that RPKI-signed >> objects can be validated automatically and in a more robust manner >> than manual processing of documents. However, some network operators >> have established processes that expect and require LOAs to be >> exchanged, despite their limitations. This document proposes a >> format for constructing a LOA in the case where RPKI validation is >> available, with the goal of enabling a transition to a future where >> LOAs are no longer needed. >> >> >> >> The IETF Secretariat >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > GROW mailing list -- grow@ietf.org > To unsubscribe send an email to grow-le...@ietf.org
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ GROW mailing list -- grow@ietf.org To unsubscribe send an email to grow-le...@ietf.org
