CODE ONLY POLICY: skip in total On Sat, 22 Aug 2026 at 04:17, Roberto A. Foglietta <[email protected]> wrote: > > CODE ONLY POLICY: skip in total > > On Fri, 21 Aug 2026 at 05:55, Roberto A. Foglietta > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On Thu, 20 Aug 2026 at 22:55, Rob Landley via busybox > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > On 8/6/26 21:30, G. Branden Robinson via busybox wrote: > > > > [looping in busybox mailing list; Bruno found a sed portability problem] > > > > > > > > Background: > > > > https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?68601 > > > > > > > > Hi Bruno, > > > > > > > > At 2026-08-06T18:07:55+0200, Bruno Haible wrote: > > > >> I wrote: > > > >>> The reason is that the 'sed' program on this platform (from BusyBox) > > > >>> ignores '-e' options when a '-f' option is present, regardless > > > >>> whether the '-e' options come before or after the '-f' option. > > > > > > Which apparently nobody noticed for 20 years. > > > > Or nobody cared about it for 20 years, which is apparently the same > > thing but it isn't. > > It was "or nobody cared to notify about it" -- Anyway, this link might > be interesting in talking about this subject: > > - https://github.com/vda-linux/busybox_mirror/pull/30 > > *** > > > This was found by running Claude Code through Semgrep's > > defending_code_harness harness, which also suggested the fix. > > Please ask Claude to create a test case to add in the busybox test > suite. With the test case, the patch is complete in its essence as > part of a system testing. > > Otherwise, we will continue living in a state of "hoping it works, but > we do not know if something new breaks something else". I can agree > that adding this test doesn't solve the general problem but it is a > step towards the right direction. And whatever we are going to buy the > bread or climb the K2, the first step in the right direction is the > fundamental step. > > Who took busybox.net and the network resources wasn't aware that the > system test, the **only** valuable part of busybox, since the code is > a "commodity" universally available, if ever existed in a form of a > digital system, it was **not** transferred with the busybox.net > resources. Preparation and understanding aren't optionals. > > *** > > To get back to the specific topic and provide a broader outlook about > it -- it necessary a premise: when someone highlights a coding error > that I did, they do me a favor because my idea of "hacking" is making > enough mistakes until the software works. By contrast, those who > believe that a hacker is never wrong lives in a state of constant and > unbearable pressure because every mistake is an attack to a Truth that > s/he interiorised as self. > > The contrast is evident: 1. it is not me, it is a step forward VS 2. > it is not about coding, it is about me. And I am writing this having > presented myself as [email protected] (where the "me" is the > person behind that name, not the ego). Plus every person has -- in a > social context -- a personage. A mask for the many who are not within > their inner circle. And this is perfectly fine. The opposite is a set > of fragility seeking for a psicodrama incident. > > Once, made this premise, we are ready to face the TOPIC and the topic > is about -- our perception of reality is an illusion and its narrative > is our jail -- many people prefer to die defending or fighting their > mind-jails rather than face the reality. Two very relevant cases that > are universal: those who prefer to die rather than face poverty, those > who invented the fiat-currency (money from nothing) to avoid > confrontations about principles and then reach the absurdity that > paying money or having money requires a "moral" status. > > Which is totally non-sense, if we keep in mind WHY the fiat-currency > (after Brettonwood) has been invented but it sounds totally reasonable > to every bureaucrat: provide me the proof that you have paid the taxes > or you aren't a criminal. It doesn't matter, both of those questions, > a criminal could deserve being paid for something else s/he did. Some > people do not pay taxes because they do not receive money from the > state on which money they should pay taxes (the taxes before the > taxes, the taxes on the invoice, not on the payment of the invoice). > > At this level of non-sense, the system collapses. Not the reality, but > the Lemanh & Brother, AGAIN. Suddenly, the DEM left the wokism (I read > in the newspaper so take this as an "information" not just a bit of > truth) and decided that attacking in 29 Meta because Facebook spread > it, it was totally fine. Isn't the first time in human history that > the worst clean their facade dumping their sh*t on those who served > them. And YOU -- open source and free software community -- served > very well. So, well that for 20 years FOSS received a totally > unchecked and unverified support. > > After 20 years, they are not coming back asking about doing-good (the > work) but the mistakes, whatever. The mistakes YOU made while > pretending doing-good. Instead, about ME, there is no way because I > never spent a minute in my life pretending doing-good. People who meet > me in person, usually know that I am a very nice person, and I am a > memorable person even when I say something that they do not like to > hear. Because the things that I write by email, I also say by persona > and what keeps me alive isn't the content or the peaceful patiente of > my listeners but the tone and the posture. People feel, who are > against them or trying to correct them for their own good. > > So, they aren't here to select a winner. They are here to point the > finger and say: YOU greedy b*stards are the ruin of this world because > -- fundamentally served them before they changed their minds -- YOU > are evil. And trust me, they are f*cking good in doing so because they > tested as hard as possible against me. So, it was me and now it is > your turn to win the hotspot -- boiling like a frog in a hot water > pot. I presume, but I can be wrong, as every human can be wrong. > > And finally -- NO -- nobody currently or in the past or in the future > -- was, is or will be cared about busybox -- apart from those who use > it. >
So , back to the Facebook trial accused of having spread Wokism among people and thus being a global machine of that "insanity" (take these words as a variable name, we see later the "what"). Totally ignoring that the whole system, politics, Hollywood, etc. were impacted. But someone that is born rich is more lively when s/he says I (and my family) is a victim of that "insanity" not supporters. Our wealth leads our business to align with the system and serve, as usual. Facebook will do the same, they will settle down for saving money, but in exchange they should have to provide something else as the "source of insanity". And let me tell you plain straight, which is the book to take as reference -- it is not 1873 the railroad tracks -- it is the "Eichmann in Jerusalem" (also known as The Banality of the Evil). And "insanity" isn't a clinical term but the same term after the defeat nazism has been labeled. However, in these second round (or better to say the third round WW1, WW2 and WW3 in terms of wars that have no limits, not in terms of geography) also a psychiatric doctrine will be evolved and this doctrine will put the "modern democracy" to an end. So, when Trump states that after his US presidency there will be anymore the vote problems, it isn't about dictatorship. It is about bringing back the opinions of those who are irrelevant to be counted for nothing (aka Marco Aurelio). This is the beauty of the American's ignorance meeting and getting fascinated by the Italian sterile rhetoric about the Greatness of the Ancients. >From a massonic's point of view it is about shifting from "In God We Trust" in "Ancient Wisdom We Trust" which is nothing else than a restyle to continuing to support the idea that believing and serving is THE whole goal of "other people nature". Like exporting democracy, by the way. It is the same identical plot that folds over another time in the same way presenting the same patterns with different colors. Do not be so happy to say -- well, at least it was not such a violent history turn -- because the violence has many forms and some are more subtle exactly because they are much less evident. Unlearned or Un-understood lessons repeat. In short the defence of Facebook will be: ok we pay a lot of money to settle down the cause but you have to point out those WHO made the wokism popular, WHO would have done the same paying money (or providing work for the cause) instead of profits. Because we at Facebook were seeking the profit but those are pushing at their expenses the ideology are THOSE who really support that ideology whatever it takes (and Draghi used the same formula for the European quantitative easing monetary policy but I am not referring to him, he recycled that meme from others. Bureaucrats mimic, never invent anything. Did you guess the names of WHO? Mastodon. Debian. It is worth noting that wokism inflates in those networks relatively in recent times (despite the seeds being there ahead in time) after the old "Guardians of the Internet" has been fired and kicked out of the system, put aside, like those who were too attached to traditions. Paradoxically, the system pushes away those that are "strongly anchored to the traditional values for allowing progress of modernity". Because every ideology that wants to be THE ideology always claims to be "modern" and "adequate for our times". So, those who would not have allowed wokism spread around has been set aside because "traditional values anchored" and those who spread the "modernity" are going to be the new Banality of The Evil, and the traditionals values are just nostalgia because "ancients are wiser". It is another round of narrative, another round of madness. Stronger, harsher and against the last ones therefore the harshest one. The consequences of these "dai la cera, togli la cera" (do and dismantle) are clear. At the end of WW3, modern democracy that allows people free speech is the root of Evil because when people are let free to communicate on a scale, they start to create story-telling, alienating from reality and then fall into madness. It is worth noting that it isn't "the people" the source of the problem rather than educating them to believe in "something superior" because when they got confused the sync on that "something superior". Imagine the collective brain as a living organism in which neurons are individuals, and the neurons get in sync (and rhyme with morons), more of them and more in sync as time advances. This is a metabolic condition that leads to a psychiatric pathology. The exact role that Cambridge Analytica, Facebook, and Mastodon played. The WW1 creates Hitler -- who was nothing rather than a insignificant individual that in the best case would have had fortune in doing cabarets at the pubs -- the WW2 was made to kill him, and the WW3 is playing the whole plot again as a comedy rather than a tragedy (but the comedy still costed 1/10 of the WW1 + WW2 lives, not exactly nothing and for some countries more than others) to lead to another wrong conclusion that The People are the problem, an idea supported by the US funders fathers that choose Republic over Democracy because democracy always tends to the dictatorship of mediocres. Great times, indeed. Especially for those who can see. Finally, a question remains: - Roberto WHY are you helping people that would celebrate at your funeral? Because it is more likely that I would ignore their funeral rather than celebrate at the mine. I am not helping, I am collecting and noting as drafts of the evidence for the Norimberga 2, that f*cking trial will not be made by itself, like everything else, by the way! However, if you ask me: "Roberto, in your opinion, WHO was behind all of this?" -- I will answer, it is irrelevant and probably impossible to determine by certainty, but for sure only a bunch of layers could have written such an over-complicated plot for learning a f*cking nothing. A bunch of layers in society with a bunch of bureaucrats, more likely. And if you like to have my opinions about those people's destiny, I will answer like someone else already did: "Kill them all, God will recognize his own" (Caedite eos. Novit enim Dominus qui sunt eius). To underline the beaty of the "ancient times", because a man without his sarcasm is nothing! Have a nice week-end, -- Roberto A. Foglietta +49.176.274.75.661 +39.349.33.30.697
