Hi Vincent, I really see a "+" underlined
Is it visually distinct from an ordinary underscore? I merely ask now out of curiosity, as Brandan explained why overstriking is a no-go. Concerning the original problem, I find myself in agreement with the general majority here: consistency with the existing *"+0 or -0"* language is probably the best fallback. Regards, — John On Fri, 9 Aug 2024 at 19:25, Vincent Lefevre <vinc...@vinc17.net> wrote: > On 2024-08-09 15:53:30 +1000, John Gardner wrote: > > Hi Vincent, > > > > > So ideally, the fallback for "ą0" should be "+0 or -0", which is > > > much more readable and less ambiguous than "+-0" or "+/-0". > > > > For approximating ą in ASCII, is there some reason \z_+0 hasn't been > > considered? > > I don't like that at all. I really see a "+" underlined, so it is > confusing. Moreover, the information is not kept by copy-paste, > and it is not rendered as wanted with "xterm +ulc" (to replace > underline by color). And I don't think that it will correctly be > interpreted by screen readers. > > -- > Vincent Lefčvre <vinc...@vinc17.net> - Web: <https://www.vinc17.net/> > 100% accessible validated (X)HTML - Blog: <https://www.vinc17.net/blog/> > Work: CR INRIA - computer arithmetic / AriC project (LIP, ENS-Lyon) >
