On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 03:15:11PM -0500, G. Branden Robinson wrote: > At 2024-03-22T20:56:28+0100, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > > I'm quite surprised that you aren't even getting the warning due to > > `eqn -Thtml`. > > I did. I elided it. I also elided nearly all of my garrulous shell > prompt. ;-) > > > I was running > > > > $ troff --version > > GNU troff (groff) version 1.23.0.902-1fce7-dirty > > > > But I can reproduce it with 1.23.0: > > Well, let me see if I can... > > Nope. Still can't.
Heh, we're comparing different things. I'm comparing `eqn -Tps` to
nothing at all, while you're comparing `eqn -Tps` to `eqn -Thtml`. If I
diff the same things you're diffing, then I see the same as you.
$ diff -u0 \
<(/usr/bin/preconv man3/_Generic.3 \
| /usr/bin/tbl \
| /usr/bin/eqn -Tps \
| /usr/bin/troff -man -Thtml -Wbreak \
| /usr/bin/post-grohtml) \
<(/usr/bin/preconv man3/_Generic.3 \
| /usr/bin/tbl \
| /usr/bin/eqn -Thtml \
| /usr/bin/troff -man -Thtml -Wbreak \
| /usr/bin/post-grohtml);
warning: /usr/bin/eqn should have been given a '-Tps' option
warning: (it is advisable to invoke groff via: groff -Thtml -e)
$ echo $?
0
Cheers,
Alex
--
<https://www.alejandro-colomar.es/>
Looking for a remote C programming job at the moment.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
