On 4/21/23 13:48, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > Hi наб and Branden, > > On 4/21/23 12:33, Alejandro Colomar wrote: > [...] > >>> diff --git a/man3/regex.3 b/man3/regex.3 >>> index f6465d484..46fd3adef 100644 >>> --- a/man3/regex.3 >>> +++ b/man3/regex.3 >>> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ .SH LIBRARY >>> Standard C library >>> .RI ( libc ", " \-lc ) >>> .SH SYNOPSIS >>> -.nf >>> +.EX >> >> I've been thinking about this, but am not yet fully convinced. I'll >> propose you the two alternatives, and let you decide what looks best. >> >> (a) Use .nf/.fi for the function prototypes, and .EX/.EE for the >> types. >> >> (b) .EX/.EE for everything, as you did. >> >> Please have a look at the PDF versions (you can run >> `pdfman ./man3/regex.3` after you `source ./scripts/bash_aliases`). >> >> If you're going to use it often, I suggest the following in >> ~/.bash_aliases: >> >> if [ -f ~/src/linux/man-pages/man-pages/main/scripts/bash_aliases ]; then >> . ~/src/linux/man-pages/man-pages/main/scripts/bash_aliases; >> fi; >> >> > [...] > >> >> >>> .B #include <regex.h> >>> .PP >>> .BI "int regcomp(regex_t *restrict " preg ", const char *restrict " regex , >>> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ .SH SYNOPSIS >>> .B } regmatch_t; >>> .PP >>> .BR typedef " /* ... */ " regoff_t; >>> -.fi >>> +.EE >>> .SH DESCRIPTION >>> .SS Compilation >>> .BR regcomp () > > Which one looks better to you? I've attached two PDF files (which > linux-man@ will reject, but I CCd groff@) so that you can compare.
D'oh! I sent wrong PDFs. Here they are. > > Any other alternatives? > > Cheers, > Alex > -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
regex.3.uacCBf
Description: Adobe PDF document
regex.3.6HycxK
Description: Adobe PDF document
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
