Hi наб and Branden, On 4/21/23 12:33, Alejandro Colomar wrote: [...]
>> diff --git a/man3/regex.3 b/man3/regex.3 >> index f6465d484..46fd3adef 100644 >> --- a/man3/regex.3 >> +++ b/man3/regex.3 >> @@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ .SH LIBRARY >> Standard C library >> .RI ( libc ", " \-lc ) >> .SH SYNOPSIS >> -.nf >> +.EX > > I've been thinking about this, but am not yet fully convinced. I'll > propose you the two alternatives, and let you decide what looks best. > > (a) Use .nf/.fi for the function prototypes, and .EX/.EE for the > types. > > (b) .EX/.EE for everything, as you did. > > Please have a look at the PDF versions (you can run > `pdfman ./man3/regex.3` after you `source ./scripts/bash_aliases`). > > If you're going to use it often, I suggest the following in > ~/.bash_aliases: > > if [ -f ~/src/linux/man-pages/man-pages/main/scripts/bash_aliases ]; then > . ~/src/linux/man-pages/man-pages/main/scripts/bash_aliases; > fi; > > [...] > > >> .B #include <regex.h> >> .PP >> .BI "int regcomp(regex_t *restrict " preg ", const char *restrict " regex , >> @@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ .SH SYNOPSIS >> .B } regmatch_t; >> .PP >> .BR typedef " /* ... */ " regoff_t; >> -.fi >> +.EE >> .SH DESCRIPTION >> .SS Compilation >> .BR regcomp () Which one looks better to you? I've attached two PDF files (which linux-man@ will reject, but I CCd groff@) so that you can compare. Any other alternatives? Cheers, Alex -- <http://www.alejandro-colomar.es/> GPG key fingerprint: A9348594CE31283A826FBDD8D57633D441E25BB5
regex.3.8RIWB1
Description: Adobe PDF document
regex.3.naOImR
Description: Adobe PDF document
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
