Hallo. Ingo Schwarze <schwa...@usta.de> wrote: |Steffen Nurpmeso wrote on Mon, Oct 10, 2016 at 01:41:43PM +0200: |> Having a definition list with some few first words in a different |> style, e.g., bold or emphasized, than directly following text in |> the same paragraph block, i.e., term and definition, or tag and |> text, in the same paragraph, is pretty common, i think. |> |> That, however, is not possible with .Bl, | |Of course that is possible in more than one way, and completely |trivial. Here are just three ways as examples for the many ways |to achieve it: | | .Bl -hang
Then i was mistaken. ... |The -diag and -ohang types can also be used, and even -bullet, -dash, |-enum, and -hyphen, if you want to. And you can of course do it |with .Pp alone, without any .Bl whatsoever. | |However, this isn't related to the original problem at all, which |was overcomplicated rules for handling lack of -width in .Bl -tag. I am not in your way. It seems to have been existent everywhere before the removal, and now has been removed. (And i will follow in a distant future.) Ciao -- and sorry, i have used those you have mentioned myself in the past, i only had a look at -tag code and saw it starting the recursion! --steffen
