> Also, how will we proceed when we will consider that this automake
> migration is ready for merge into master?  The normal process would
> be to squash all the commits into a single one on master, but given
> the high number of files impacted, it might be better to have all
> the commits into master?  In this case should I need to add a entry
> in ChangeLog per commit on automake3?

IMHO, your changes are too large for a detailed ChangeLog entry.
Instead, I recommend that you simply merge your branch back into
master, leaving your single commits intact.  The merge should be
accompanied with a ChangeLog entry that gives an overview of what the
commits in the branch do.

> Also, I will need to change the dates of the commits (currently the
> first commit related to automake on `automake3', which comes after
> the most recent commit in master, is dated in August).

Why do you want to change commit dates?  I don't see a problem here.


   Werner

Reply via email to