Hi Steffen, > I have your message also in my queue but it will take quite some > time until i will be able to use your test. > ..I agree with Betrand: it would be better to understand the code > paths as such.
I definitely agree, although as I said to Bertrand, I think the first goal should be to get system tests in place. > I personally would be happy if there would be input <=> expected > output tests available that could be driven by make(1) / sh(1) > / awk(1). > But having input <=> expected output datasets available at all > would be just plain fantastic, especially if under GPL2 or ISC or > another really free license! I agree! Rob Robert L. Bocchino Jr. 291 S. Euclid Ave., Apt. PH8 Pasadena, CA 91101 (217) 979-1053
