Hi Peter, > I still think an underlining request should be considered for groff,
Agreed, but it should offer strike-through too. And both u̲n̲d̲e̲r̲l̲i̲n̲e̲ and s̶t̶r̶i̶k̶e̶-t̵h̵r̵o̵u̵g̵h̵ should allow double variations, and probably triple; double-underline is used to indicate small caps as single is for italic, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Underline#Manuscripts > but perhaps a compromise would be to add Werner's macro to the tmac > directory. It's in the archives (Dec. 18, 2003). Thanks, that's http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/groff/2003-12/msg00079.html Cheers, Ralph.
