On 11/12/13 16:21, Eric S. Raymond wrote: > Colin Watson <cjwat...@debian.org>: >> I'm happy with the quality of the bzr import we did, and long preferred >> its UI, but even I have begun moving my projects to git in the >> acknowledgement that it's won the DVCS wars; > > I myself prefer Mercurial's UI to git, ...
So do I; in fact, I find git to be every bit as repulsive as its name implies: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/git?q=git However, I would still advocate setting up a public repository with git, simply because its ugliness is mitigated by Mercurial's hggit extension; once the git repository is in place, I can 'hg clone' it, 'hg pull' from it, 'hg push' to it, and otherwise treat my local clone as if it were a regular hg repository, while giving those who really want to put up with the nastiness of git the freedom to do so. -- Regards, Keith.