On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 10:41:45AM +0100, walter harms wrote: > Am 25.01.2013 00:52, schrieb Colin Watson: > > At present, I see no need to rock the boat by changing anything; the > > dual-licensing of documentation files seems adequate. > > NTL, for some people that is an issue and i am not a friend of double > licensing > because that may cause complication.
I think this is FUD, quite honestly; I see no reason why dual-licensing causes any particular complication if the copyright holders are happy with releasing under either of those licences. As a downstream you can essentially ignore it and pick either one if you prefer. -- Colin Watson [cjwat...@debian.org]
