Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap12.html
>
> However, those rules are not really helpful IMHO in our discussion how
> such macros should look like.
It gives an overview about the types of arguments that need
to be handled by such macros. For example, it shows that
there are non-optional options for which .OP in the given
form is also not sufficient.
In the real world outside the standard, there are also
other types of arguments, e.g. optional option-arguments.
A -man extension for the public should be comprehensive
enough to handle all these cases.
Gunnar
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
