if libicons works while iconv() produces wrong results would it be the
better way to use libiconv in general ? (until iconv() problems are fixed ?)
just my 2 cents,
walter
Bruno Haible wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
The answer "patch
glibc so that iconv transliterates the bullet to 'o'" is better (and in
fact this is doable), but I think that users of non-Glibc systems (or
old Glibc) will complain if this becomes the official answer.
Why should they complain? They can use GNU libiconv. It transliterates the
bullet to 'o', like you wish.
Bruno
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
