> > And there seems to be a good groff mode for vim. Unfortunately,
> > the groff mode for emacs is rather bad AFAIK...
> >
> >
> Yet roff (1) reads "The best program for editing a roff document is
> Emacs (or Xemacs)"...!
This is related to the general editing capabilities of Emacs which are
superior to most other editors.
But there isn't a special groff mode, only a mode for nroff, which
means that (most? all?) groff extensions are not supported.
Compare this with AUCTeX...
Werner
_______________________________________________
Groff mailing list
Groff@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
