On 5/19/05, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Volunteers, volunteers! I'm swamped with other work.
And which approach do you like best? The one you initially proposed -- having internal Char type or going in wchar_t-transparent direction (we would get multibyte input as a bonus)? The latter seems to me a better approach (judged by standards :), but I'm not sure about portability issues that may arise (there may still be platforms out there that still do not have wide characters). > They aren't stable yet. The developer has started to play with > fontforge and changed some metrics so that URW is no longer compatible > (w.r.t. metrics) with the standard PS fonts. Hmm. Perhaps, some old release without these issues could be chosen? These fonts were quite good looking from the very beginning (for my non-professional eye :). -- Regards, Wartan. _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
