On 4/26/05, Werner LEMBERG <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On comp.tex.latex there was some discussion w.r.t. document layout > stability and hyphenation patterns: > > Subject: Consistency of US hyphenation patterns across distributions > References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Up to today, noone has ever mentioned a similar problem here, and I > must admit that I've never thought about it. > > The current state of groff is simple: It does *not* assure layout > stability, this is, it is quite possible that documents look different > if processed with different groff versions. I don't think this is a > serious problem because you can always use an older groff release in > case this stability is important to you.
Well, David Kastrup (the AucTeX maintainer) gave this answer in the same thread (msg-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>): ---start quote It is not a problem. LaTeX, in contrast to plain TeX, has no "frozen" policy. Document compilations are not guaranteed to stay the same across installations and across time. In particular hyphenation patterns are revised and augmented. Also, an installation is free to change the default hyphenation patterns from US English (though this is really not advisable: where necessary, you can make British patterns available separately). Some stability is preserved: for example, the layout of the standard document classes is not changed in LaTeX2e, neither is the float placement algorithm, though both clearly leave things to be desired. ---end quote And a inflamatory response by the OP was anwsered in similar terms by Frank Mittlebach (the project leader of the LaTeX project) [msg-id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>]. So.... I would think that this is a "Red Herring" in the true meaning of the idiom. OTOH, the OP in that thread is some sort of Trafalgar Square haranger; I think they call them trolls nowadays. Having followed c.t.t. for almost 15 years on and off, that's the conclusion I reached after giving him the benefit of the doubt the first two years of reading his, rather amusing and technically interesting, posts. _______________________________________________ Groff mailing list Groff@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/groff
