> We can still assert that women are under-represented in open source 
> projects compared to the rest of the industry (see my last post) and 
> that there are systemic factors behind that. 

I would agree.

I support reasonable efforts to address under-representation and the systemic 
factors behind them.

I think this is appropriate, even a duty, for large open-source projects with 
the resources to devote some of those resources to addressing these issues.

I am open to arguments that the value of meritocracy is a systemic factor and 
de-prioritizing meritocracy as a value will help address under-representation 
in a real way.

I am not convinced though that the concept of meritocracy itself is a systemic 
factor in under-representation. I can see how meritocracy could be misused 
based on how merit is assigned and/or defined. I can see how that could be used 
against people, for a variety of reasons including discrimination. I also think 
this is mitigated at least partially by the transparency of open source, the 
scarcity of resources in open source, and the ability to fork open source 
projects.

I am also not convinced that de-prioritizing meritocracy as a value will help 
address under-representation in a real way. I think what is meant by 
meritocracy in an open source project should be defined and done so in a way 
that promotes diversity and inclusion, but not done away with. I would like to 
see data from organizations that followed this path and how effective it was at 
diversity and what effect, if any, it had on output.

I worry that saying we have to abandon meritocracy as a value, given the 
general understanding of that word, to promote diversity and inclusion sends 
the wrong messages. First that the people the project is trying to reach will 
never be able to participate on a level playing field with existing 
contributors, which is horribly condescending and factually not true. Second 
that Mozilla is lowering it's standards in any way, that's what some people 
will believe and like it or not it affects perception of the project.
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to