On Thu, Aug 24, 2017 at 10:23 AM, Kurt Roeckx via governance <
governance@lists.mozilla.org> wrote:

> On 2017-08-23 16:33, Alex Gaynor wrote:
>
>> I had the same question, but it looks like RAPPOR has gotten significantly
>> more advanced since I originally learned about the "just boolean
>> questions"
>> version. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1503.01214.pdf explains how to build
>> privacy
>> preserving measurements without knowing the values of the population.
>>
>
> So if I understand things correctly from the paper, you create a bloom
> filter for the URL/hostname you want to send, then randomly change it,
> store that. And each time they ask about the URL/hostname you take the
> stored version, randomly change it and that's what you send.
>
> What I understand from that is that you don't get to learn the
> URL/hostname at all, but can query if a URL/hostname has been submitted.
> You don't get to learn what the population is, but the whole population can
> be send.
>
> Is that accurate?
>

Hi,

through RAPPOR, we can send randomized values for all encountered domain
values.

Then, in analysis, we can test the noisy aggregate data against known
domain values and get an estimate of how frequently they occurred.

This gives immediate insights and we can increase the detail by adding more
sources for known domain values.

Georg
_______________________________________________
governance mailing list
governance@lists.mozilla.org
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance

Reply via email to