On 10/20/15 9:04 AM, Myk Melez wrote: [snip]
Regarding the proposal itself, initially it seemed strange to collect emeritus owners into their own module, because it would dissociate them from the modules they formerly owned. I would have expected the status to be an attribute on each module, much as some current owners/peers are marked "inactive" today. But after sitting with it a bit, it makes more sense as a recognition of project leadership (both in the assumption of an ownership role and in its relinquishment). And it could also be a resource for new/emerging leaders who are looking for mentors or role models. So I think it's a good idea. -myk
I've sort of come around to your initial thought ... that we collect emeritus folks in each module. That's mostly because the list of owners and peers is a bit more to maintain and having the module folks each do this for their own module is probably best. perhaps we can then make a list of emeritus folks, as jst has done for owners.
ml _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
