Hey - I appreciate all the feedback. I've tried to read all the message in this thread and respond to them here. Firefox is a constantly evolving system that is always changing and never finished.
Pocket has been a popular Firefox Add-On for a long time and we've seen that users love to save interesting Web content to easily revisit it later, so it was an easy choice to offer Pocket as a service in Firefox. and we've gotten lots of positive feedback about the integration from users. All the code related to this integration within Firefox is open source and Pocket has licensed all the Firefox integration code under the MPLv2 license. On top of that, Pocket asked Mozilla for input on how to improve their policy, based on early comments from Mozillians. After that discussion, Pocket updated their privacy policy in early May to explain more precisely how they handle data. You can read Pocket's privacy policy here: https://getpocket.com/privacy. Directly integrating Pocket into the browser was a choice we made to provide this feature to our users in the best way possible. To disable Pocket, you can remove it from your toolbar or menu. If Pocket is removed from the toolbar or menu, then the feature is effectively disabled, though you can still find it again by accessing it in the Customize Panel. You can find detailed instructions here: https://support.mozilla.org/kb/disable-pocket-on-firefox Feel free to reach out to me directly via email bcl...@mozilla.com Thanks, ~ Bryan -- Product Manager, Firefox : Pocket On Friday, June 5, 2015 at 2:59:56 PM UTC-7, tucker....@gmail.com wrote: > (Pasted from https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1172126. There are > some comments on Hacker News at https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=9667809). > > Mozilla's recent integration with Pocket, a proprietary third-party service, > is a mistake. > > It is very exciting to see the ways in which Firefox continues to improve. > And it's even more exciting to see the ways that Mozilla advances it's stated > mission outside of the Firefox browser with new developments like Firefox > Accounts. Pocket now allows you to log in on their site using your Firefox > Account; being able to authenticate with a trusted third party like Mozilla > is a huge win for online privacy advocates and the Mozilla community. > However, adding Pocket as a built-in feature to Firefox should not have been > done. > > This is particularly surprising since it was Firefox that made browser > extensions mainstream. Pocket should have been an extension (in fact, a > Pocket extension used to exist). It could have even been bundled with the > browser. This distinction is important, since extensions can be removed > entirely, whereas currently Pocket can only be disabled. > > The user experience of disabling Pocket is not good, either. It needs to be > disabled in about:config, which is not at all user friendly, and therefore > not in line with Mozilla's mission. In the past, Mozilla has been very good > about showing the user what new features have been added to the interface and > explaining any privacy implications that may come with them. That is why I > was so surprised when the Pocket icon suddenly appeared in Firefox Developer > Edition a couple days ago. It is so unlike Mozilla to introduce something > like that, I ran a virus scan and checked what programs had been installed > recently -- I assumed it had been put there in the same way that IE users > used to get the Ask Toolbar installed. > > It may also not be clear to some users that, even when signing in with your > Firefox account, you are still giving your email address to a third party > whose privacy policy is different than Mozilla's. Many users would not assume > this, since it is a feature that is bundled with the browser. > > Mozilla's recent blog post about the Pocket feature is titled "Firefox Puts > You in Control of Your Online Life" > (https://blog.mozilla.org/blog/2015/06/02/firefox-puts-you-in-control-of-your-online-life/). > Had this been coming from a startup, that post would be humorously ironic. > But given how much people care about Mozilla and it's stated mission, it is > more painful than funny. > > Firefox should continue to add new features that benefit its users, but those > features must be done in accordance with Mozilla's core values. This feature > should've been done as an extension, which allows for greater user choice and > avoids bloat. Most importantly, there was very little public discussion about > this inclusion of a proprietary, third-party service. It's a huge departure > from Mozilla's commitment to transparency. The existence of the Pocket code > in Firefox is a bug in the browser, and it does not adhere to Mozilla's core > mission. _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
