On 5/17/14, 7:30 PM, Jim wrote:
Mozilla did not even put up a fight
You're entitled to your opinion, of course, but I respectfully disagree.
Three passing comments does not demonstrate any heart or fight. You have made more posts defending Mozilla's decision to implement the EME!
I care a lot more about what people here think than what people in the HTML WG, most of whom had their minds pre-made-up, think, honestly. I also care about making sure we're not missing obvious alternative paths that are actually viable.
You should know that only a formal objection has any standing.
You can't "call out" TBL in a formal objection...
I summarized my understanding of the proposal in my last email to you.
I'm afraid I'm missing a crucial part of your proposal: how do you plan to get the CDM to play along with it?
My point is that Mozilla did not even try.
I think that's a disservice to the people who have spent at least a year now working full-time on dealing with this (including Henri).
Firefox could recognize media needing DRM decoding and launch a separate media player.
How is that fundamentally different from launching a plug-in?
This would keep DRM out of the web
How so, if the user experience is still seamless? -Boris _______________________________________________ governance mailing list governance@lists.mozilla.org https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/governance
