Eugene van der Pijll wrote:
> En op 18 november 2002 sprak Ton Hospel:
> 
>>Well, we have to do SOMETHING,
> 
> 
> Why? As far as I'm concerned, it's OK to have two winners. Especially if
> they are as good as this. (I enjoyed the first three, four hours of the
> contest, when I was battling Chris Dolan for 1st and 2nd; I'm a bit less
> enthusiastic now that I'm 'fighting' with Chris for 12th...)
> 

Yeah, same here.  Maybe we need to start a one-hour "speed golf"
competition.  :-)  Ton already awarded me "FP" for tpr06.

Ooh, how about first entry that passes the test program wins!  It would
be drag perling, or perl skeet, or simply sprint perl.

>>I agree that it's very late in the game for these changes, and I'm
>>open to alternative suggestions.
> 
> 
> Time of submission? It has always been my favorite :-) . And I think
> there was more than 24 hours between Rick's and Stephen's solution, so
> time zones have had no decisive effect.

(seriously) I think we can all agree that time should not be a deciding
factor.  We do the TPRs as week-long competition so differences in time
zone and work schedules cancel out.

Chris

Reply via email to