In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
        Jason Parker-Burlingham <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ton Hospel) writes:
> 
>> Wait and have a game as usual.
>> If after, say, a week you think you won't be able to get a golf done at
>> all this month, tell us, and we can then discuss options
>> (e.g. I'd try to get a quick team together. I have enough ideas
>> for challenges)
> 
> I'm afraid a golf this month just isn't going to happen.  I haven't
> been at all well for the last week (the details have been thoughtfully
> elided from this message) or so, and consequently a number of
> real-life responsibilities have piled up.
> 
> `/anick has a great idea for a challenge which could run either this
> month or in some subsequent month.
> 
> I really regret picking up the responsibility and having to lay it
> back down so.
> 
In that case I'd like to step forward to run this month's golf.
Mtve's system is not yet ready to host a TPR-style challenge, so
it would be on the classic PGAS system with human referees. therefore
my questions are:
 - is this ok for anybody ? Does especially Yanick prefer to
   run this one with his idea ?
 - Who controls uploading challenges and passing access rights to
   PGAS nowadays ?
 - Referee candidates, please send me mail saying you want to referee
   And please do so quickly. We're already late.


Reply via email to