Eugene van der Pijll wrote:
>
> En op 12 april 2002 sprak [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> >
> > I don't think there should be any such limitation.
> > If someone win's the golf round 3 times running they deserve the recognition
> > for that.
>
> It's not about a limit on winning, it's about a limit on receiving
> prizes. Winners will get the recognition, whether they get a book or
> not.
>
> I don't think an official limit is a good idea, but if someone wins for
> the umpteenth time, I would encourage them to give up their prizes after
> a few times to the number two, or to the winning beginner, or to the
> most elegant golfer, or to the referee (hint, hint), or something.
>
The big hint I would infer from this is that if someone wins n times in a
row, they are obliged to referee the next game. I'm not sure how it might
work. But it sounded like a good idea when I thought of it.
Jasper
--
Kirk: This is a mystery, and I don't like mysteries. They give me a
bellyache, and I've got a beauty right now.
