En op 07 april 2002 sprak Keith Calvert Ivey: > This is sad. I'm reduced to silly tweaks to lower my > tiebreaker score and catch up with Andrew, with the true goal > still at a seemingly unattainable distance. Unfortunately, in > order to change horses one must find a new horse to change to.
Yep, my horse is dead too, and I've got nothing to leap onto. :-( I am filled with admiration for Lars; that 61 is quite remarkable and I suspect it will go down in golfing lore, even more so than Eugene's famous reverse. You've caught me Keith! Tied at 79.39. Funny if we had identical solutions, even down to the same 'artistic' choice of delimiter (that we always pay such meticulous attention to). I noticed the tie-breaker bug too; I got my tie-breaker down to 39 just by changing things around until it reported a lower score. For cheap thrills, I just submitted one with a tie-breaker of .03 (I won't mention its primary score though). I was dismayed to see Eugene has shot ahead of me again and am quaking with fear at the looming sight of a dieting `/anick, storming thru the field to 83 now. /-\ndrew
