On Wed, 11 Jun 2025 at 00:01, Alexander Shopov <a...@kambanaria.org> wrote:
> Therefore - why were method sets designed this way? It was totally > possible to not do the automatic inclusion of methods on non pointer > types to the method set of pointers to the types. > What about my explanation was dissatisfying? It would be possible not to do it, but there would be downsides. > > Kind regards: > al_shopov > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAP6f5MkAO5VfC9WhCMy%3DR%2BfCgoQefjFs%2BX01KRU1rK2adwTj5A%40mail.gmail.com > . > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAEkBMfEGdXT0KoSgKvPgXJxyh%2BBZPMamyBUUoM26d9krY8kpBw%40mail.gmail.com.
