So in 2012 Cyril Oblikov wrote
Why isn't this code correct?
var N int = ...
for i := range N {
doSmth(i)
}
In my opinion it looks much simpler than:
var N int = ...
for i := 0; i < N; i++ {
doSmth(i)
}
So we should say to Cyril (whether he is today), that it is now correct.
You just needed to wait around for a 12 years.
Because you were just ahead of your time....
And if you are reading these lines, please post again to give us a glimpse
of what new features we should expect to be added to Go in 2036...
- amnon
On Saturday 24 February 2024 at 01:20:04 UTC Duncan Harris wrote:
> I made some changes to use range over int in our code base and was
> pleasantly surprised with the improvement in readability.
>
> We had quite a few instances where the number of iterations involved a
> function call which we don't want to repeat:
>
> - for i, n := 0, f(); i < n; i++ {
> + for i := range f() {
>
> A surprising amount where we no longer need the range variable including
> some nested loops:
>
> - for repeat := 0; repeat < col.Repeat; repeat++ {
> - for j := 0; j < len(cats); j++ {
> - for k := 0; k < numStats; k++ {
> + for range col.Repeat {
> + for range len(cats) {
> + for k := range numStats {
>
> There were also all the benchmarks:
>
> - for n := 0; n < b.N; n++ {
> + for range b.N {
>
> We could update the docs in https://pkg.go.dev/testing accordingly :-)
>
>
> On Friday 23 February 2024 at 06:18:33 UTC Henry wrote:
>
> This is one feature that provides little value beyond saving a few
> keystrokes and looking slightly nice, but with potential of increased
> complexity when we need to implement more important features to the
> language down the road. This is my opinion. It shouldn't have been added,
> but what was done is done. There is nothing we can do about it now.
>
> On Sunday, February 18, 2024 at 5:38:25 AM UTC+7 poweredb...@gmail.com
> wrote:
>
> I agree with you.
>
>
> Powered By Citizen
>
> On Saturday, February 17, 2024, 1:19 AM, Kurtis Rader <
> kra...@skepticism.us> wrote:
>
> It's not just changing `k` inside the loop body that makes the
> transformation invalid -- your observation also applies to modifying `i`
> inside the loop body. Modifying either variable inside the loop body is
> extremely rare in my experience and doing so warrants a "dragons be here"
> comment. Still, your point is valid and anyone applying such a
> transformation should carefully evaluate the body of each loop to see if
> either variable might be modified by the loop body. Obviously it would be
> nice if a tool automated that analysis and transformation but I'm not going
> to hold my breath waiting for someone to implement that tool.
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 11:06 PM Patrick Smith <pat42...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 16, 2024 at 10:27 PM Amnon <amn...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> But now it is out, I think it is great, and have run
> perl -pi -e 's/for (\w+) := 0; \1 < ([\w()]+); \1\+\+/for \1 := range
> \2/' $(git grep -l for) over my entire codebase to use it everywhere.
>
>
> You know your own codebase, and maybe this was safe for you to do. But in
> general, blindly applying such a blanket change has the potential to cause
> bugs, as these two are not always equivalent:
>
> for i := range k
> for i := 0; i < k; i++
>
> In particular, if k is changed inside the loop they may be very different.
> https://go.dev/play/p/kAHcmu7377I
>
> (Yes, many people, myself included, would consider changing k inside such
> a loop to be bad coding style. But "bad style" doesn't mean it's not going
> to be done.)
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAADvV_trGNxeLUma722wk-JOGnz42fJqM8%3DVZ36TKpr5s-%3DmOQ%40mail.gmail.com
>
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAADvV_trGNxeLUma722wk-JOGnz42fJqM8%3DVZ36TKpr5s-%3DmOQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
>
> --
> Kurtis Rader
> Caretaker of the exceptional canines Junior and Hank
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com.
>
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CABx2%3DD9Hyjj_N9KjY6XfFH0ZUt55f27VCcZQSj_DyX36gzrX1g%40mail.gmail.com
>
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CABx2%3DD9Hyjj_N9KjY6XfFH0ZUt55f27VCcZQSj_DyX36gzrX1g%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
> .
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/ee355172-59a4-423f-8287-56010883c97cn%40googlegroups.com.
