Sorry, but I have been away and missed the context.

What is the protest about?

What has redit changed?

Thanks

On Saturday, 24 June 2023 at 06:07:38 UTC+1 Axel Wagner wrote:

> On Sat, Jun 24, 2023 at 3:03 AM cpa...@gmail.com <cpa...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> If 100 people are on a boat and 51 want to sink the boat is that fair to 
>> the 49 who want to live?
>
>
> This is not a life-or-death situation and such comparisons are almost 
> universally unhelpful, as you literally do not have a choice in them.
>
> You’re taking a resource away from others.  
>>
>> If someone wants to protest Walmart they don’t burn it down. 
>>
>
> No one is burning down anything. But, again, protest has to be 
> inconvenient. And contrary to the claims made by you and Jan, yes, it is 
> actually completely normal (and legal, in most legislatures) for a protest 
> to temporarily "take resources away from others". Roads get closed for 
> protest marches all the time.
>
> But really, what I miss most here is an argument about the actual subject 
> matter. If you are frustrated about the subreddit being closed, you can 
> direct that frustration at the moderators or you can direct it at Reddit. 
> If they didn't implement their API changes, the protest would end, after 
> all.
>
> You seem to be taking it as a given that the moderators are the 
> appropriate target of the frustration and that they should be automatically 
> the one to give in. When Jan asked me - an unrelated party - to refund his 
> Reddit fee, he could've just as well written to Reddit, telling them that 
> he wants his money back because their insistence on overcharging for their 
> API causes this protest and makes reddit less valuable to him. That 
> would've likely done exactly as much to get his money back. But it would 
> actually exert pressure on someone who has a hand in this issue - after 
> all, threatening Reddit's bottom line is what this protest is all about. 
> And given that his business relationship is with Reddit, that's the only 
> party he actually has any real leverage with. So I'm really confused that 
> someone would bend over backwards, logically speaking, to misdirect their 
> frustration this way.
>
> If you want to convince me, at least, that the protest is bad, you have to 
> convince me that the API charges Reddit is implementing are good and 
> justified and that the moderators are wrong to object to them. You won't 
> convince me with arguments about the procedure.
>
> Or to put it another way: In your metaphor, you are assuming that the 
> moderators protesting are the ones who are trying to sink the boat. I'm not 
> convinced of that. To me, they make a pretty convincing case that it's 
> their actions which are trying to keep the boat afloat, by preserving 
> third-party tools that are essential to reddit's operation and the 
> voluntary labor of the moderators. And if the owner of a ship directs it to 
> steer into an iceberg and the crew objects, I'd expect the passengers to 
> back them in it, instead of complaining that they'll be late and how dare 
> they obstruct *my* right to have the ship go wherever I want.
>
> Anyways… as I said, this isn't actually such a dramatic situation. It's 
> just a website being closed for a bit. And if the mods are open to a vote 
> on whether or not to participate in the protest, that seems a perfectly 
> serviceable process to me. People should feel free to vote on that poll 
> however they like. I just wanted to provide some counterweight to the 
> initial call to vote against the protest.
>  
>
>>
>> On Friday, June 23, 2023 at 4:37:20 AM UTC-4 Axel Wagner wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 10:29 AM Jan Mercl <0xj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jun 23, 2023 at 10:18 AM Axel Wagner
>>>> <axel.wa...@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Just for context, as not everyone seems to be aware: I was, in that 
>>>> sentence you quoted, referring to examples like this
>>>> > 
>>>> https://www.reddit.com/r/ModCoord/comments/14eq8ip/the_entire_rmildlyinteresting_mod_team_has_just/
>>>> > This demonstrates that even with overwhelming support from the 
>>>> community (and yes, in this example the modifier applies), the company 
>>>> overwrites those wishes to shut down protest. There are a couple of other 
>>>> subreddits with similar stories.
>>>> >
>>>> > So I was making the case to *provide* overwhelming support for the 
>>>> mods of /r/golang, referring to precedent of other subreddits where that 
>>>> is 
>>>> happening. Not claiming that they already have it.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for the added conext.
>>>>
>>>> Anyone not liking Reddit is free to not visit the site. Anyone not
>>>> accepting the price for the API access is free to not buy it. It's
>>>> fine to vote by your visits and by your wallet. That's how the free
>>>> market works and it works well unless there's some monopoly. But
>>>> Reddit has no monopoly.
>>>>
>>>> Protesters are free to protest. That's their respected right.
>>>> Protesters have no right to deny access to other users. That's my
>>>> right and I expect it to be equally respected.
>>>>
>>>
>>> /r/golang has no monopoly.
>>>  
>>>
>>>> PS: I'm paying $7/month to Reddit to have r/golang ad-free. May I ask
>>>> you for a refund? Thanks for your consideration.
>>>>
>>>
>>> You may certainly ask *the company you are paying* for a refund.
>>>  
>>>
>> -- 
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
>> "golang-nuts" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
>> email to golang-nuts...@googlegroups.com.
>> To view this discussion on the web visit 
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/ef228331-2230-4f62-8478-5a186fbbd299n%40googlegroups.com
>>  
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/ef228331-2230-4f62-8478-5a186fbbd299n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/50b58520-c911-40be-96c3-0b351870bbdcn%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to