I think what is being suggested that if the sec team bans all applications that exhibit dynamic code loading behavior they’d be safer - which would catch a lot of apps in the net.
> On Aug 23, 2022, at 10:44 AM, Brian Candler <b.cand...@pobox.com> wrote: > > >> On Tuesday, 23 August 2022 at 15:30:49 UTC+1 Gopher-Insane wrote: >> The issue is not a vulnerability in the language itself but the use of that >> language to embed malware so AV signatures do not detect it. The feeling is >> that our InfoSec will be wanting to restrict obscure languages (Go, Rust >> etc...). > > And how exactly does choosing not to use Go/Rust in your own organization, > avoid you from getting infected by malware written in Go/Rust? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > To view this discussion on the web visit > https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/a465a7ff-3e13-458d-a7f8-61c0375c38a7n%40googlegroups.com. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CD882B25-875C-48BF-9AC2-C3E003B38451%40ix.netcom.com.
