Go will have support for generics soon. You won't need reflection anymore. \o/
https://github.com/samber/lo On Friday, September 3, 2021 at 3:53:45 PM UTC+2 Howard C. Shaw III wrote: > Just so you are aware of what's out there: > > https://github.com/robpike/filter > > "I wanted to see how hard it was to implement this sort of thing in Go, > with as nice an API as I could manage. It wasn't hard. > > Having written it a couple of years ago, I haven't had occasion to use it > once. Instead, I just use "for" loops. > > You shouldn't use it either. > > Rob Pike > > " > > https://github.com/JohnCGriffin/yogofn - uses reflection, but has > non-reflective code for float64, int, and string slices. > > https://github.com/kulshekhar/fungen - uses go generate to create > list-like types with MRF functions. > > https://github.com/thoas/go-funk - reflect-based generic MRF, along with > some single-typed instances > > https://github.com/benashford/go-func - another reflection based MRF > > https://blog.gopheracademy.com/advent-2015/glow-map-reduce-for-golang/ - > glow is more like your example, using channels for MRF, but adds the > ability to shard and distribute the shards. > > You might want to look over these and see what differentiates your > solution so that you can mention it in your Readme.MD. Also, don't forget > that generics are coming in 1.18, and they are already enabled in go-tip, > so you can be working on a non-reflection based generic solution. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/49feb64e-f7e4-448d-9faa-44ca0228a5fdn%40googlegroups.com.
