On Thursday, March 18, 2021 at 1:53:30 PM UTC+1 ren...@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> One other point on this. Generics will be trivial for 95% of the people - > they will only need to be able to read and write the instantiation > statements of type safe collections. > > Most developers don’t write the generic implementations - these are > provided by library authors. > That is an unsupported claim. I've waited for Go to have generics for the simple case of having compile time type safety of registry patterns instead of copying my code x times for resorting to go:generate. It just makes life much easier. As I’ve said before, I would of taken a more go-like approach - generics > seem too technical for most go developers - but in the end they will be a > net benefit. > The community has tuned and chosen the approach. The discussion of type params imho proves that "no good" designs are iterated until they are acceptable to a majority. You can support these discussions. Cheers -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/56ebe8cc-ab0d-40d4-b478-a7bc92bc321an%40googlegroups.com.
