On Wednesday, January 6, 2021 at 9:40:15 AM UTC-5 Brian Candler wrote:
> On Wednesday, 6 January 2021 at 12:40:24 UTC tapi...@gmail.com wrote:
>
>> func blah[T1]T2 (x T1) T2 { ... }
>>>
>>> x := blah[int]string(123)
>>>
>>
>> I didn't see anyone propose this syntax from the above comments.
>>
>
> To quote the message which started the thread:
>
>
>
> *I think something like sync.Map[string]linked.List string is more
> readable than sync.Map[string, linked.List[string]].*
> *I propose putting the last type parameter to a generic type after the
> square brackets and omitting them when there is only one type parameter.*
>
> I accept it was talking about type parameters to types, not type
> parameters to functions (although it would be weird if they were different).
>
> But even if you think only about types, it doesn't make much sense to make
> the last type parameter distinct from the others. Another silly example:
>
> # current
> type Circle[T1,T2 any] struct {
> x,y,radius T1
> color T2
> }
>
> type myCircle Circle[float64,string]
>
> # proposed
> type Circle[T1 any]T2 any struct {
> x,y,radius T1
> color T2
> }
>
> type myCircle Circle[float64]string
>
I think OP's mistake "argument" as "parameter" in title.
OP didn't specify how to declare a generic type.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/d5df1e82-c31e-41fa-a3e5-20acbf8d722fn%40googlegroups.com.
