Hey Marcin Can you give me the pointer on C library and if can be used in Cgo .
Thanks On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, 22:27 Shobhit Srivastava, <simplysh...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah the inclination is towards 512 curve only so need to optimise it. > > Will check out the C library. Thanks > > > > On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, 22:22 Marcin Romaszewicz, <marc...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> secp256r1 has been hand optimized for performance, the others haven't. >> >> If performance there matters to you, it's actually faster to call out to >> C libraries to verify 384 and 512 bit curves. >> >> On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 9:27 AM Shobhit Srivastava <simplysh...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi All >>> >>> I have tried to do the performance analysis for different curve in >>> golang and got below output: >>> for secp256r1 I got 28000 Signature verified per second >>> for secp384r1 I got 1600 Signature verified per second >>> for secp521r1 I got 700 Signature verified per second >>> >>> Is there something I did wrong or is this the usual results? >>> >>> Let me know if someone has done performance comparison. >>> >>> Best, >>> Shobhit >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "golang-nuts" group. >>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send >>> an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >>> To view this discussion on the web visit >>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/fdc14759-b995-43af-948d-cdb2201e4718n%40googlegroups.com >>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/fdc14759-b995-43af-948d-cdb2201e4718n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >>> . >>> >> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAHM18J3ZoO6SeUNteRE4aHg9MZsD-_Gy4OGvvg3jQ417QzmmOA%40mail.gmail.com.
