Yeah the inclination is towards 512 curve only so need to optimise it. Will check out the C library. Thanks
On Wed, 7 Oct 2020, 22:22 Marcin Romaszewicz, <marc...@gmail.com> wrote: > secp256r1 has been hand optimized for performance, the others haven't. > > If performance there matters to you, it's actually faster to call out to C > libraries to verify 384 and 512 bit curves. > > On Wed, Oct 7, 2020 at 9:27 AM Shobhit Srivastava <simplysh...@gmail.com> > wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> I have tried to do the performance analysis for different curve in golang >> and got below output: >> for secp256r1 I got 28000 Signature verified per second >> for secp384r1 I got 1600 Signature verified per second >> for secp521r1 I got 700 Signature verified per second >> >> Is there something I did wrong or is this the usual results? >> >> Let me know if someone has done performance comparison. >> >> Best, >> Shobhit >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups >> "golang-nuts" group. >> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an >> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. >> To view this discussion on the web visit >> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/fdc14759-b995-43af-948d-cdb2201e4718n%40googlegroups.com >> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/fdc14759-b995-43af-948d-cdb2201e4718n%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer> >> . >> > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAHM18J0wyHQhiSfJdCwJTM93xQJ0n98CyhN%2BYWxczsKLYc-sMQ%40mail.gmail.com.
