On Fri, Jun 19, 2020 at 4:16 AM Michael Jones <michael.jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Really smart and accomplished people have worked for a year to refine the > generics approach--as the impressive updated design draft and the scholarly > FeatherweightGo paper both demonstrate. The design is accompanied with > tools to allow development and experience by any interested Go developer. > This is marvelous. Thank you Go team and helpers! > > I read the FWGo paper and I liked what I saw. I think the current path has a good chance of solving a large majority of the cases where you currently find Go lacking in expressivity. And it can also provide a more type-safe programming style, which is always welcome. Fitting parametric polymorphism (or type lambdas) into a language post its release isn't that easy. This is promising in my opinion. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAGrdgiVHre%2Bw9wS92i%3Dgb1hV_gtaKLWyrO5uY0ycQy4k8v4Q9g%40mail.gmail.com.
