I doubt this will help, but I have to try...
Really smart and accomplished people have worked for a year to refine the
generics approach--as the impressive updated design draft and the scholarly
FeatherweightGo paper both demonstrate. The design is accompanied with
tools to allow development and experience by any interested Go developer.
This is marvelous. Thank you Go team and helpers!
Let's post about substantial things in the design ("generic type switch
necessary at day one" maybe, whatever) and not only about parenthesis. I'm
going crazy here seeing all the comments about that. I mean, think of how
hard they are working on this; parenthesis posts read like *More Cowbell *to
me.
Sorry for the outburst,
Michael
P.S. I challenge you to fully read the Featherweight Go paper and the
design draft, as I did, and then come away thinking about the expression of
the idea rather than the idea. I just can't comprehend it -- it is the
ideas that hold power and beauty, that will transform our daily work.
--
*Michael T. jonesmichael.jo...@gmail.com <michael.jo...@gmail.com>*
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CALoEmQyzv%3D4JxtJjpqC6R5u%3DkwjMtYH%3Die9H3KQYWyB3U%2B1Ybg%40mail.gmail.com.
