On Fri, May 8, 2020 at 10:58 PM 'Axel Wagner' via golang-nuts <golang-nuts@googlegroups.com> wrote:
> Well, that's what the nomenclature used to be. It was changed, because the > term got ambiguous and confusing once type-aliases got introduced. Turns out, > it's still confusing because people confuse "defined" and "declared". Every name that represents a type and does not stand for a type alias is a defined, formerly named type. The essence is in the existence of the name for the type. If it's declared in user code of magically by the compiler does not matter. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAA40n-ULQuLo2s8sBbnxqTXVXA5Wvh9yirRAqQMjNbu%3DGQT4pw%40mail.gmail.com.
