On Sat, 29 Jun 2019 22:09:10 -0700 (PDT) Lucio <lucio.d...@gmail.com> wrote:
> a lot of people have presumably realised that the consequencesof tackling > the verbosity of the current iteration of error handling comes with a big > price tag. I personally am in horror I would lose the clear sight of the flow. Current verbosity saves hundreds of manhours even in moderate size projects. Go's verbosity makes almost all reads strictly local and speeds up code reviews. > Go is not just simple, it is mostly "elegant". Go2 must not be allowed to > become a second generation design, by democratic dictum. The "try" problem at hand is deeper and more serious I think. "Try" is now on the fast track because it is a brainchild of one of Go founder fathers. So it is not 'by democratic dictum' per se. 'Dictum' was just an impulse, IMO. (I'd say dictum of "the stubborn and vocal minority of fresh convertites". I was in this camp myself for some months, too). Anyway I still have hope that our leading team consist of great people. And great people, people of merit are able and willing to say 'I was wrong' when faced with real flaws in their design even if pointed to by a dilettante stranger. TC, -- Wojciech S. Czarnecki << ^oo^ >> OHIR-RIPE -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/20190630112433.509d99fd%40zuzia. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
