> I will let Andrey speak for himself. Since this is turning into a bit of fisticuffs I will quote my private message to you for clarity, here it is:
------8<--------- Your point is a good one. I agree with your stance. > Which is why nothing should be done, because every proposal is going to fall > short of exception handling, and be little more than syntactic sugar over > what is available today. > > And Go has advantages over in many areas so stating “if you want decent error > handling use Java” makes my case quite nicely. ------8<--------- It still means "if you want Java error handling use Java". What was lost from my original email is that I advocate another survey which places the question of error handling at the front and that is more vocally popularized/disseminated (the sample set from the 2018 survey that places 5% of participants as having issues with error handling is not a sufficiently large one, the issue and proposals trackers are an even smaller sample set). -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/golang-nuts/CAK4xykWarMpqcnktowpAhxXmfuZdORVVSjzVZymvLP%2BGUJOU1A%40mail.gmail.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
