Thomas Bushnell, BSG <tbushn...@google.com>:
> Suppose it has a way, however. Now you have Go code which will have a
> bounds fault instead of a data leak. That's better, I suppose - the
> resulting bug is now "the server crashes" instead of "the server maybe
> leaks a key". This is an improvement, but a packet-of-death across a widely
> used library this puts the world in a not dissimilar position in terms of
> the level of panic and rapid response everybody needs.
The difference is trhat an overt bug will elicit a fast fix.
--
<a href="http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond</a>
My work is funded by the Internet Civil Engineering Institute: https://icei.org
Please visit their site and donate: the civilization you save might be your own.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
