Everybody is always aging, nothing to read into. Sent from my iPhone
> On Oct 28, 2018, at 8:51 PM, Scott Cotton <w...@iri-labs.com> wrote: > > > >> On Monday, 29 October 2018 00:25:04 UTC+1, kortschak wrote: >> Prior to about a couple of months ago, it was very rare to see anything >> here about exciting additions to the language from aging gophers. I >> think it's probably fair to say that many of us were quite happy with >> that situation. > > Not sure myself as an aging gopher how to interpret that. > > Also, Robert's comments on Ian's proposal, the subject of this thread, is > about how to move the language forward > as it changes. The discourse has digressed a bit, and it would be nice to > stay on more topic, but it happens. Not sure > myself how or if the question of happiness with or without aging gophers is > relevant. > > Scott > > >> >> On Sun, 2018-10-28 at 07:31 -0500, Robert Engels wrote: >> > Next thing Gophers will be crying for is lambda syntax... just wait. > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "golang-nuts" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
