On Tuesday, October 16, 2018 at 12:16:16 AM UTC-4, Beoran wrote: > > For niw, I don't see what complelling benefits allowing operators in > generic contracts would bring. >
Consider Ian Lance Taylor's smoke test for generics. It is: can we implement min() and max() on a generic type. What he's getting at is that a generic-type system that doesn't have enough contract-making strength for this is going to disappoint a lot of the people who report wanting generics. I agree. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
