I believe copying the map containing structs and not pointers would make it consume twice the amount of memory which isn't desirable in my case.
- Julien On Tuesday, 30 January 2018 00:09:21 UTC-5, Tamás Gulácsi wrote: > > Do you really need pointers tonyour structs in the map? Because that > causes the headache here: if no pointers, then simply rlock-ing the map, > copying / serializing would be enough. > > Could even have two maps, each gets every modification, except when > copying, when the secondary is serialized, thn updated with the accumulated > changes. With a goroutine managing the secondary, executing commands > (update, delete, marshal) from a buffered channel, this wouldn't uterfere > with the main map. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
