I was thinking https://github.com/boombuler/barcode for the creating of the QR or Aztec code and https://github.com/LazarSoft/jsqrcode for the decoding? I was assuming that JS would be best for decoding in a PSA website?
But I'm totally open to other ideas! What do you think the specification should look like? I'm not great with documentation... Cheers! Frank On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 12:22:01 PM UTC-5, matthe...@gmail.com wrote: > > Yes, but the godoc seems incomplete ( > https://godoc.org/github.com/boombuler/barcode/aztec) so I figured we > could do a better job. Perhaps we only need encoding, but this lib doesn't > provide decoding. Given the MIT license we could use it as an > implementation source. The primary author doesn't provide an email address ( > https://github.com/boombuler) but there does seem to be recent activity. > > Using github.com/boombuler/barcode may be the right choice. I wanted to > get something down, but we do still need a specification for this project. > > Matt > > On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 10:50:41 AM UTC-6, Frank Davidson wrote: >> >> Matt - You saw this library, correct? >> https://github.com/boombuler/barcode >> >> On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 11:19:27 AM UTC-5, matthe...@gmail.com >> wrote: >>> >>> Here's the aztec patent that's in the public domain: >>> http://www.adams1.com/patents/US5591956.pdf >>> >>> For QR it seems that the "patent is not exercised": >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3710937/what-is-the-spec-for-formatting-data-in-qr-codes-i-can-not-find-it-anywhere >>> >>> So I suggest we do use the aztec code. I've started a github project >>> with the Apache 2.0 license where I'll add an initial API soon: >>> https://github.com/pciet/aztec >>> >>> Perhaps the central authority could be a blacklist instead of a >>> whitelist? While the report indicates Kenya has no law against drug >>> counterfeiting we could aid in notifying authorities and providing evidence >>> in places that do have these laws. >>> >>> I'd assume most CA's would remove organizations misrepresenting >>> themselves. But is that the case for all of them? >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 10:25:07 AM UTC-6, Tamás Gulácsi >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes, exactly. >>>> That's why I think this needs some central authority - maybe >>>> cross-signing the manufacturer's public key is enough. >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
