I created this true quantum random number generator, perhaps excessive, for the random vector in the ECDSA algorithm.
https://github.com/davidsonff/qrand Check it out and feel free to criticize! I'm sure it's overly paranoid, but I figure it's probably as truly random as can be... It falls back to math/rand if there's no internet. Cheers! Frank On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 12:22:01 PM UTC-5, matthe...@gmail.com wrote: > > Yes, but the godoc seems incomplete ( > https://godoc.org/github.com/boombuler/barcode/aztec) so I figured we > could do a better job. Perhaps we only need encoding, but this lib doesn't > provide decoding. Given the MIT license we could use it as an > implementation source. The primary author doesn't provide an email address ( > https://github.com/boombuler) but there does seem to be recent activity. > > Using github.com/boombuler/barcode may be the right choice. I wanted to > get something down, but we do still need a specification for this project. > > Matt > > On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 10:50:41 AM UTC-6, Frank Davidson wrote: >> >> Matt - You saw this library, correct? >> https://github.com/boombuler/barcode >> >> On Thursday, December 28, 2017 at 11:19:27 AM UTC-5, matthe...@gmail.com >> wrote: >>> >>> Here's the aztec patent that's in the public domain: >>> http://www.adams1.com/patents/US5591956.pdf >>> >>> For QR it seems that the "patent is not exercised": >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/3710937/what-is-the-spec-for-formatting-data-in-qr-codes-i-can-not-find-it-anywhere >>> >>> So I suggest we do use the aztec code. I've started a github project >>> with the Apache 2.0 license where I'll add an initial API soon: >>> https://github.com/pciet/aztec >>> >>> Perhaps the central authority could be a blacklist instead of a >>> whitelist? While the report indicates Kenya has no law against drug >>> counterfeiting we could aid in notifying authorities and providing evidence >>> in places that do have these laws. >>> >>> I'd assume most CA's would remove organizations misrepresenting >>> themselves. But is that the case for all of them? >>> >>> Matt >>> >>> On Wednesday, December 27, 2017 at 10:25:07 AM UTC-6, Tamás Gulácsi >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> Yes, exactly. >>>> That's why I think this needs some central authority - maybe >>>> cross-signing the manufacturer's public key is enough. >>> >>> -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
