Sorry to but in but what happened to the whole logging initiative that was
on going?
Did I miss something about that? It seems very related to this.

tors 17 aug. 2017 kl 09:10 skrev dc0d <kaveh.shahbaz...@gmail.com>:

> As they say global variables/things are bad. But I even use a global
> Context and WaitGroup for signaling the termination of the whole program.
> On exit the context will get canceled and the program waits for the
> WaitGroup with a timeout. I would like to have those inside another
> built-in package.
>
> There are many cases (/packages) that one can not pass the Context (and
> the WaitGroup) to each and every goroutine. It's possible to define a
> struct and use it as a closure for those functions(now methods). But one
> has to rewrite the whole interface to a package.
>
> Forcing the function signature *everywhere* is not a practice/pattern
> anymore (hint: if it was not forced to be *everywhere*, it was a
> pattern). It's something else.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "golang-nuts" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"golang-nuts" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to