On Tuesday, 25 April 2017 23:25:14 UTC+3, Tong Sun wrote: > > > On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Egon wrote: > > I think the extra "enum" package would reduce readability. The code you >> are putting into package is ~10 lines of code... so the extra package >> doesn't reduce much typing, but it also loses enum typing... Depending on >> the enum, you may want to have different properties as well... >> I chose the name "ciota" because of "custom-iota", in practice you would >> want something more descriptive such as "NewWeekday". > > > So the solution is easy, don't create a general purpose package for it :D >> > > OK. > > If going that route, and I have several enum series to define, I need to > define a series of almost identical functions, right? Hmm..., that'd be > really messy. >
It depends what you need to do... I've shown in this thread multiple approaches. There probably are much more. Without knowing the context, it would be difficult to recommend a better one. For example, you could define a DSL or custom generator or use some tool... + Egon -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
