On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 3:42 PM, Egon wrote: I think the extra "enum" package would reduce readability. The code you are > putting into package is ~10 lines of code... so the extra package doesn't > reduce much typing, but it also loses enum typing... Depending on the enum, > you may want to have different properties as well... > I chose the name "ciota" because of "custom-iota", in practice you would > want something more descriptive such as "NewWeekday".
So the solution is easy, don't create a general purpose package for it :D > OK. If going that route, and I have several enum series to define, I need to define a series of almost identical functions, right? Hmm..., that'd be really messy. Ok, I'll think of a better way on my own, which I doubt I could, :-) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "golang-nuts" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to golang-nuts+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
